independent and unofficial
Prince fan community site
Wed 18th Jul 2018 6:31pm
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Politics & Religion > SCOTUS: Case Rulings Summer 2018
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 2 <12
Reply   New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 07/03/18 9:10am

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

Dancelot said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

Trump v. Hawaii


Travel ban case

In Favor of Trump... 5-4

I agree with this ruling. As I have said non-us persons who have not been officially granted the privilege to be on US soil have no US Constitutional rights. Furthermore, as I have said, Islam is not just a religion or just an ethnicity, is sure as hell is not a race... but it is also a social-political movement. And ALL NATIONS damn sure have a right to control those aspects of ANYONE wishing to enter into their country.

yet the travel ban does not apply to countries that orange ego-pig has some buiness with, even though 15 of the 9/11 hijackers came from SA. the travel ban would NOT have prevented 9/11. let that sink in... lol

obviously anyone who actually thinks this is done for the security of Americans or that this could actually improve security, is just a naive dumbed down propaganda controlled fool nuts dunce lol


[Edited 7/3/18 5:42am]

It may very well prevent more attacks... not only directly but also indirectly. you agree with me that the motive is questionable. I have been critical of it in the past as well... and when he added a few not islamic states I said that was cover...


Since and only because you mentioned 9/11... what would have likely prevented it was if clinton would have taken action when he was able to do so... he was offered USB and 'able danger.'

And the memo bush received held no actionable information. We already KNEW they were highjacking planes... duh... and we also knew they wanted to attack NYC (they had already and clinton did NOTHING)

Anyone for banning the AR15 must be on the side of the criminal as once banned only criminals will have them.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 07/03/18 9:11am

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

2freaky4church1 said:

I believe in this ruling because other drooling morons agree.

I am glad you have the courage to admit that!

Anyone for banning the AR15 must be on the side of the criminal as once banned only criminals will have them.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 07/03/18 9:14am

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

PennyPurple said:

RodeoSchro said:



In other words, that ruling is great for grifters. Considering we have the greatest grifter of all time as president, and people who support him support grifters, then I guess we shouldn't be surprised at the reception for this ruling among those who support grifting.

It's only going to get worse. Especially with the job opening for the Judge. sad

I know how you feel... if that woman, hillary, had won she was dead set on reversing the 2nd... and appointing justices that would have put social justice above the constitution. (2 things she said directly)

Anyone for banning the AR15 must be on the side of the criminal as once banned only criminals will have them.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 2 <12
Reply   New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Politics & Religion > SCOTUS: Case Rulings Summer 2018